Highlights ·Â       Â
Israeli
Report Admits Systematic Torture of Palestinian Prisoners: On 9 February 2000, an official Israeli
report was finally made public, stating that Israel’s security service, the
Shin Bet, committed systematic torture of Palestinian prisoners and detainees
during interrogations. Moreover, the report stated that Shin Bet agents had lied
about such actions in court. The
findings detailed in the report covered the period of the Palestinian uprising (intifada),
from 1988 to 1992. Despite its
original submission to a parliamentary subcommittee in 1995, the report was kept
secret until this time. Only
following the recommendation of the Israeli Supreme Court were the findings of
the report made public. In 1999,
the Israeli Supreme Curt finally banned interrogation methods consistently
defined by human rights organizations as torture.Â
Prior to that decision, in 1987, the year in which the uprising began, an
Israeli government commission had actually approved such violent means of
interrogation as acceptable. These
methods included, inter alia, violent
and excessive shaking, covering a prisoner’s head with an odorous sack, and
shackling the prisoner in painful positions for long periods of time.Â
Furthermore, as indicated in the report, Shin Bet agents repeatedly and
routinely used even more extreme forms of torture on the Palestinians they had
detained or imprisoned. The report’s
findings regarding such systematic Israeli torture and violation of the human
rights of Palestinian prisoners and detainees all serve to prove what the
Palestinian side and many international organizations and human rights groups
have constantly asserted over the years: that torture was indeed an official,
sanctioned and concealed Israeli policy. ·Â       Â
Ministerial
Committee on Displaced Persons Convenes: The quadrilateral Committee on Displaced Persons met in Cairo from 6 to
9 February 2000. The meeting was
attended by Egyptian Foreign Minister Mousa, Jordanian Foreign Minister Khatib,
Israeli Foreign Minister Levy, and Palestinian Minister Shaath. The displaced
persons are considered to be those Palestinians who fled the West Bank and Gaza
during the 1967 hostilities. In
accordance with the Israeli-Palestinian Declaration of Principles of 1993, they
should have been allowed to return during the transitional period.Â
However, Israel has continuously delayed the convening of the Committee
at all levels and has tried to avoid the implementation of its obligations in
this regard. This has been possible through the use of various tactics,
including the refusal to reach agreement on the definition and the number of the
displaced persons. The
above-mentioned Ministerial meeting was convened only after a lot of pressure
and the meeting arrived at an agreement that all problems in this regard should
be resolved in three months, after which the return of the displaced persons has
to begin. If we are to believe the
Israeli side this time, those displace persons might finally be able to go back
soon to their homes and properties. ·Â       Â
President
Arafat Visits Washington:
President Arafat, accompanied by a large Palestinian delegation, paid another
official visit to Washington, D.C. from 19 to 21 January 2000. During his visit,
President Arafat had meetings with President Clinton and with Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright and other U.S. State Department officials.Â
In making the trip, President Arafat was seeking support for the peace
process, which has been hampered by difficulties during this critical period
prior to the deadline for a “framework agreement”, and to seek U.S.
assistance with regard to the final settlement negotiations. At all of the meetings held, the Palestinian side stressed the need for full American engagement and active participation in the peace process. In this connection, it was proposed that the negotiations on the final settlement be moved to Washington, D.C. (a proposal that the Israeli side later rejected). The Palestinian side also emphasized the need for full compliance with all of the agreements reached between the two sides and compliance as well with the delineated time limit. During the meetings, President Clinton and other U.S. officials gave clear assurances with regard to both issues. Contrary to
claims by the Israeli media, the Palestinian side did not present any paper to
U.S. officials during the visit. The
decision not to do so was the result of a firm conviction that the Israeli side
had in fact not yet decided to proceed seriously and in full speed with the
negotiations on this track. Â |